Please don’t let David be the mod! I will go away…
From: Payton Kramer<mailto:payton@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 5:53 PM
To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are Wrong about
Many Thrust to Mass Ratios
If only this was a forum where a mod could move this to the correct thread ;)
On 1/30/2017 5:51 PM, David Smith wrote:
Seriously, Richard, I haven't seen you post a good reason for not using
metallic ballast.
Wait. Is this off-topic?
Ooops...
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:20 PM, R Dierking
<applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Sorry; delete.
Just a zing to David’s post. “Moderated for life.” Good one I must admit.
Still, look through the nose weight topic posts. Perhaps you still think I
don’t have any good reason for the suggestion?
From: R Dierking<mailto:applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 5:16 PM
To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [roc-chat] Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are Wrong about
Many Thrust to Mass Ratios
Why didn’t anyone mention about what these photos revealed? Lots of people
said they were cool. But what did they help to show?
Richard Dierking
--
David P Smith
NAR 78668, L2
Amateur Extra, W6DPS
