[roc-chat] Re: Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are Wrong about Many Thrust to Mass Ratios

  • From: David Smith <davew6dps@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:51:01 -0800

Seriously, Richard, I haven't seen you post a good reason for not using
metallic ballast.

Wait. Is this off-topic?

Ooops...

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:20 PM, R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Sorry; delete.

Just a zing to David’s post.  “Moderated for life.”  Good one I must admit.

Still, look through the nose weight topic posts.  Perhaps you still think
I don’t have any good reason for the suggestion?



*From: *R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent: *Monday, January 30, 2017 5:16 PM
*To: *roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject: *[roc-chat] Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are Wrong
about Many Thrust to Mass Ratios



Why didn’t anyone mention about what these photos revealed?  Lots of
people said they were cool.  But what did they help to show?



Richard Dierking




-- 
David P Smith
NAR 78668, L2
Amateur Extra, W6DPS

Other related posts: