[roc-chat] Re: Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are Wrong about Many Thrust to Mass Ratios

  • From: Payton Kramer <payton@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:52:36 -0800

If only this was a forum where a mod could move this to the correct thread ;)


On 1/30/2017 5:51 PM, David Smith wrote:

Seriously, Richard, I haven't seen you post a good reason for not using metallic ballast.

Wait. Is this off-topic?

Ooops...

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:20 PM, R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Sorry; delete.

    Just a zing to David’s post. “Moderated for life.”  Good one I
    must admit.

    Still, look through the nose weight topic posts.  Perhaps you
    still think I don’t have any good reason for the suggestion?

    *From: *R Dierking <mailto:applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    *Sent: *Monday, January 30, 2017 5:16 PM
    *To: *roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    *Subject: *[roc-chat] Next: Layered Photos - Why They Show We Are
    Wrong about Many Thrust to Mass Ratios

    Why didn’t anyone mention about what these photos revealed?  Lots
    of people said they were cool.  But what did they help to show?

    Richard Dierking




--
David P Smith
NAR 78668, L2
Amateur Extra, W6DPS

Other related posts: