I would take the average of the first second. Allen -------------------------------------------------------------------- Allen H. Farrington 818-653-2284 web: http://www.allenfarrington.org On May 24, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Chris Coffee <chris_coffee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for the clarification, gentleman. Wedge, how exactly would I get > the initial thrust data? Would that be the Maximum Thrust on the thrust curve > site? Or is it a different number that I have to calculate somehow? > > From: Allen Farrington > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 8:46 PM > To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Clarification > > If you use a longer rail and have decent fins (2 calibers of CG over CP) then > you should be fine. Low wind as well would help. > > Allen > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Allen H. Farrington > 818-653-2284 > web: http://www.allenfarrington.org > > On May 24, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Wedge Oldham <wedgeoldham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The math is right; but you should use initial thrust rather than average >> thrust. >> >> On May 24, 2013 8:23 PM, "Chris Coffee" <chris_coffee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> A little help here, please? I need to know if someone can tell me if my >> calculations are correct for a Thrust-To-Weight calculation for an upcoming >> flight...and whether or not the rocket should be flown on said motor? Thank >> you. >> >> >> Madcow Sensor weighing in at 7 pounds on the pad. 54mm motor mount. Using a >> Cesaroni I100-RL-LB this is what I got: >> >> Average thrust of motor (according to ThrustCurve) = 98.5Ns >> >> Divide 98.5Ns by 4.45 to get 22.13 average thrust in pounds >> >> Divide 22.13 pounds of average thrust by 7 to get a Thrust-To-Weight ratio >> of 3.16:1 >> >> Is this correct? >> >> If my math is correct, I would say that the rocket should not be flown with >> the I100. >> >> Okay, folks.....school me!!! LOL >> >> >> Christopher L. Coffee > >