<div dir='auto'>Oh,,, Panatomic X... ;-)<div dir="auto"><br></div><div
dir="auto">50 or 125 Ilford would be fine</div></div><div
class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 6, 2023 19:08, Tim
Daneliuk <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<br type="attribution"
/><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">All the chatting in the thread about
Nikons, their repair, and my bad <br>
case of NAD (Nikon Acquisition Disorder) caused me to ponder something. <br>
<br>
Say it's time to downsize. Perhaps you have too many cameras in
(ahem) <br>
a single format. Maybe you have (ahem) too many lenses. Maybe you
need <br>
to slim down the number of films you shoot. Whatever the case,
it's <br>
time to thin the herd... <br>
<br>
Please answer the following questions: <br>
<br>
<br>
For each format you shoot: <br>
<br>
1) What camera and one or two lenses (max - no cheating) would you
keep? <br>
2) What one or two films would you keep for ALL formats? <br>
<br>
<br>
My answers follow: <br>
<br>
35mm: Nikon F2, 20mm f/2.8, 85mm f/1.4 <br>
<br>
6x6: Hasselblad, 60mm f/3.5 Distagon, 120mm f/4
Makro-Planar <br>
<br>
6x9 "Baby" Speed Graphic, 101mm f/4.5 Ektar, 65mm f/5.6
Schneider Super-Angulon <br>
<br>
4x5 Wisner Technical Field, 150mm f/5.6 Schneider APO Symmar,
210mm f/6.8 Caltar-II <br>
<br>
Films: Ilford FP4+, Tri-X <br>
<br>
I'd actually prefer Fomapan 200 or Efke 100 over the FP4+ (both are 200 speed
films) BUT... <br>
Fomapan in 120 has major quality issues and Efke is no longer made. <br>
<br>
<br>
What say you all? <br>
============================================================================================================= <br>
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there. <br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div>