Sounds like a challenge Laurence. Maybe we should all start posting photos of how messy our work areas get, and vote on a winner, or loser, as the case may be. I've been cleaning up lately, but I'm sure I mess with the best of them. I'd like to see Dennis' messy darkroom too! What do you say Dennis? E. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15 Dec 2009, at 16:07, Dennis Purdy wrote: > > You are probably doubting my credibility Ralph and I would say that anyone > making any claim is possibly spouting off for the pleasure of it or creating > their own personal mythology. My situation is that I have been doing custom > lab work for 25 years now and I still process film all the time though now I > try to keep it to film day which is Monday. Because I am constantly doing > it I can easily run various tests and throw them in with my work flow. I do > this partly out of boredom but mostly out of a desire to know things, or > sometimes just a desire to shoot some film around the house where my lab is. > > What usually happens with my test film is that it sits by the light table > and the densitometer un cut or partly cut until I get tired of looking at it > and tired of the mess and I throw it out. Some stuff I keep if it is > especially interesting to me, like comparisons between lenses and cameras or > paper types with developers. > I actually printed the test I referred to with the Tmax 100 in various > developers and those prints lay on my print rack for months until in a > frustrated moment of cleaning the chaotic lab up I must have thrown them out > as well because I just looked in several boxes and they aren't there. > I can describe the scene I shot with that if that helps. I shot sunlight > coming through the window onto a vase full of water with very dark cut > bamboo in it. I was studying the detail in the bamboo and the surrounding > dark room as well as the highlight detail where the sun hit the bamboo and > where the sun hit the glass vase. And I not only shot the test with my > Rolleiflex 2.8FX, but I shot it as well with my Pentax 67. I am a testing > idiot. > But after looking just now I can't find that film or prints. You want me to > do the test again? You want me to go around with a digital camera and show > the piles of stuff I have to sort through? > Dennis Purdy > > Denis, its great to know that there are people who are doing this kind of > testing for their own information, and who are prepared to share their > conclusions with us. I'd actually appreciate seeing some digital shots of > the piles of stuff, but purely for personal reasons, so that I can feel less > guilty about the state of my darkroom. Although I have a sinking feeling > that my darkroom will out-disorganize anything out there! > All > All the best > Laurence Cuffe > > On Dec 15, 2009, at 07:39, Ralph W. Lambrecht wrote: > > Dennis > I would be interested to see this side-by-side comparison. Are those prints > still available? > > > > > > Regards > > > Ralph W. Lambrecht > > > ============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.