[pure-silver] Re: Rodenstock Depth of Foeld/Scheimpflug Calculator

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:38:52 -0700


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Brick" <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Rodenstock Depth of Foeld/Scheimpflug Calculator


Not recommended. DOF cannot be done by the numbered angles and/or DOF charts. DOF is done by looking at the ground glass with a loupe and tilting/stopping down until what you want in focus, is in focus. This is based on exactly 49 years of doing this - I was taught this at Brooks Institute of Photography in 1959 and it has served me really
well since then.

But if you want it as a gadget to occupy some unused space, then I
guess it would be good.

:-)

Jim


The problem with DOF calculators or charts is that they are based on certain assumptions about what the eye will perceive as sharp. The assumptions are not always true. DOF can be confusing because some calculations are based on constant resolution and some on constant percentage of focal length. The former can be useful where lenses of different focal lengths are used on the same camera for images of the same size, the latter when comparing depth of field for lenses of constant angle of view, that is for instance, the depth at a given f/stop for a 12" lens used on a 4x5 camera and a 45mm lens for a double-frame 35mm camera. So, when quoting some "rule of thumb" for DOF make sure which system its for. Also note the the "effective" DOF will depend on the visual angle for the final image. That is, if an 8x10 print is made from a 35mm negative and compared to an 8x10 contact print from an 8x10 negative the required resolution of the 35mm negative must be multiplied by that required of the print. Ultimately, this also depends on viewing distance, i.e., the size of the image at the retina of the eye. There _are_ some applications, such as aerial photography, where actual minimum resolution is important.

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: