From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:48 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Replentishing With New Developer
On p.379
On 7/18/2017 5:45 AM, `Richard Knoppow wrote:
The attachment is the correct paper. Despite its age it is still very
interesting especially since D-76 and similar developers are still widely used.
I found another paper in the reports of the National Bureau of Standards
which is available via Google at:
<https://books.google.com/books?id=m1XoiwpU4TIC&pg=PA391&lpg=PA391&dq=crabtree+and+carlton+d-76&source=bl&ots=0ixPJZ_kb7&sig=tNi1_20oWClMulgvQbUecjRYrjM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwie0MTl65LVAhXkqlQKHdSHAC4Q6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=crabtree%20and%20carlton%20d-76&f=true>
On 7/18/2017 5:15 AM, titrisol (Redacted sender titrisol for DMARC) wrote:
Is this the article from Crabtree and Carlton ?
I found some notes from 1999 whit your explanations
--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL
--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL
Attachment:
Developers-Comparison-Bureau of Standards-1933.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
