[pure-silver] Re: RC paper and fixer questions. Also a sink update

  • From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 00:20:34 -0700

   Try fishing, good way to use up worms.
   I will try to answer the question about RC print flatness. It depends on the weather. Because of the way RC paper is made it seems to be more sensitive to humidity. I found that in very dry weather RC tends to curl up tightly and then relax when there was more moisture in the air. I don't know a good cure for this.
    My technique with fiber paper is to flatten it in a dry mounting press. This was originally a part of the procedure I use to dry mount pictures. One step is to dry out the mounting materials and the print using a heated dry mount press. I make a sandwich of the print with a layer of release tissue over the emulsion side and clean construction paper as an absorbent layer on the support side. This sandwich is placed in the heated press and the press closed by not locked and left for perhaps two minutes. Then I take the sandwich out and place it under a flat weight, preferably one made of metal, and let it cool. I find this will flatten the print and for some reason it stays flat despite variations in humidity. The trick does not work on RC I think because there is no way to change the amount of moisture in the support.
   BTW, the traditional way of drying fiber also plays a part in keeping it flat. That is drying on screens with the emulsion side facing the screen. This tends to equalize the rate of drying between support and emulsion. If a fiber print is just hung in air the emulsion side will dry much faster than the support. I think something similar happens with old fashioned blotter books. The emulsion faces the glassine sheet and the support is against the blotter. Blotter books work pretty well but I don't use them because there is too much chance of contamination. At least with screens, especially plastic ones, one can wash them.
    I agree that RC is much faster to work with than fiber, mostly because the wash time is so short even when a wash aid is used for the fiber paper. BTW, wash aid is not necessary for RC and probably should not be used.
    I don't know what the current thought on print life is but RC probably is nearly as long lived as properly processed fiber. If I had to make prints for archival purposes I think I would still use fiber.
   It seems to me the degradation of the images on RC due to decomposition of the brightener in the support is very much a thing of the past. However, for either kind of support treating the prints with a polysulfide toner is still good practice.
   I don't know about the shelf life of wash aid. It probably depends on how well the bottles are sealed. In general, I don't like old chemistry. At least with developer you can tell if it works but its not so simple with other stuff except that probably sodium fixer will last for ever.
   I would consider inks a can of worms. I am sure there are research papers on ink life. I see degraded paper more often than faded ink but my experience is quite casual. I will be interested in what others think.

On 8/7/2021 10:02 PM, mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok, it is time to open the preverbal can of worms question.  Just how long will an RC print last.  Trying to find reliable data seems to be a problem.  One one side you get its trash, and on the other it will last 70 years or so. One side says fiber base will last 500 years, but some of the really early prints are less that 200 years old.

I also know that outgassing was a real problem with the early RC prints.  No doubt about that, but I also know the technology has improved.  If RC has improved to a 70 year life, and our current variety of (gasp) digital prints are in the 70 year range (and I read something about inks outgassing as well), why do art galleries seem to accept a digital print, but an RC print with roughly the same life is scorned.

RC prints have so many advantages from an ease of use, that its tough not to consider them.  It's also possible my data is flat out wrong.  It is also possible that art galleries perception is also not in touch with reality.  Though a painting can last for hundreds of years without issue, photography isn't so fortunate.

In Fort Worth the Kimball Museum of Art has paintings from the 1400s that look like they could have just dried.  I doubt any form of photography can touch that.  Like many I sang, please don't take my kodachrome away, but they didn't listen. For fiber to actually last longer, it has to be properly fixed, washed and toned.  RC is far more tolerant of mistakes, and yes we all make them.  Be interested on all your thoughts.

Question 2   I have some Ilford Rapid fix that I have had for a long time.  One has been opened but not been mixed into solution.  It is still in the original container, but just not used.  The other is still sealed.  Is either any good?

BTW I have some Heico wash aid that I still have from a long time ago.  Again the container has been opened, but the chemicals have not been mixed with anything.  Not sure how sensitive either fix or a wash aid might be to such conditions.

Finally a sink update.  Its almost complete.  I have one door on the unit to build and install, but other than that construction is complete.  It worked out that I have three levels and the sink.  The levels are rock solid and can be extended out to make it easier for one to proceed to the next.  There is about 8 inches between levels.  Should allow rooms for my hands to work in the gap if needed.  A 16x20 tray fits perfectly.  Give a developer, stop and fix tray, with the sink being a wash or holding station of just water.  For fiber prints or toning, I had to accept a reset.  That way I can use a wash aid, toning and final wash.  Anything bigger than 16x20 will need to be single tray processed.  That is ok.  I can build a tray for the larger sizes if needed.  Truthfully I think its probably unlikely.

Today I got the water ready, and tomorrow the drain system will be dealt with.  I had to use a normal faucet, instead of a system I came up with that as soon as hot water got to the sink, it would be the same temp as it was when I last shut it off.  A conventional faucet was more practical, but I did get a side sprayer to help with clean up.  I think the wife will like this much better.  We all know happy wife, happy life.

None of it was particularly hard for me, but it was the type of work that can be frustrating.  A 16th too long in one place and it hits on a support.  Push to hard, and the nails bend.  None of that was a surprise.  I knew up front I was working with warped wood and scrap many would have discarded. Yet I find a sense of satisfaction of making what would have been trash into something useful, even if it isn't fine furniture.

Yes its taken time, but I have added a great deal of storage, made the darkroom more efficient and made the wife happy in the process.  That makes the time and effort worth it.  Looking forward to using the 4x5 field camera soon



Thanks for your comments in advance

Mark

KG5VE 73


==========================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: