Times I've used w/pyrocat hd copied from my filemaker notes: TXP 4x5 320 6 mins 1:1:100 72° Tri-X 35mm 14mins 1:1:100 @72 Pyrocat HD HP5 120 Pyrocat HD 2:2:100 7:15 mins @ 72° Pyrocat HD HP5 5x7 12 mins @72° 2:2:100 Looked good. Pyrocat HD 2:2:100 @72° 8 mins. TMX 4x5 FP4+ Pyrocat HD 1:1:100 70° 10 mins. TMY Pyrocat HD 2-2-100 8 mins. 70° 35mm TMX 2:2:100 8.5 mins 72. ________________________________ From: richard lahrson <gtripspud@xxxxxxxxx> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 2:19 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Pyrocat -HD Starting Points Hi! I've been following this thread as I bought some Pyrocat HD last week. I'm using HP5 in ABC Pyro and the densitometer says 1.7 max less fb/fog. I guess that's good for a fast film. I am setting up to try carbon printing again and want negatives for both silver and carbon. I've been reading Sandy King and Sullivan. Best, Rich On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, <mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >Eric this was the results of the TMY test with Pyrocat-MC > >Jonathan > > >________________________________ > >From:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Nelson >Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:16 PM > >To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Pyrocat -HD Starting Points > >I typically only use T-max 100/400 for myself, but up until recently I have had all kinds of film thrown at me from clients thus requiring 'research'. I've wanted to try some other flavors of pyrocat but haven't gotten around to it. Until recently, I was one of the few places that could provide that kind of processing commercially. Now I'm moving and will only be doing it for myself. >e > > >________________________________ > >From:"mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:08 PM >Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Pyrocat -HD Starting Points > >My only experience is with Pyrocat-MC and Fuji Neopan 100. Which film are you using? > >Jonathan [mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > >________________________________ > >From:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pablo Kolodny >Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 11:25 AM >To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Pyrocat -HD Starting Points > >Hi Eric, > >I know I'm almost nobody here since I rarely post to the list but I try to keep up to date by reading many if not all of other's messages. > >Pyrocat HD is not something that made me an expert but I do have now a nice amount of film processed with this developer. It is a wonder, indeed. > >Massive development Chart usually is a good starting point, what I've found out is that those times are a bit short to me so I just add about 15 to 20% BUT what I also do is to rate film by half the nominal speed, yes, I like contrast and density and though I might well abuse the wellness of Pyrocat HD in what respects to non blocking highlights... this seems to work well for me for printing on silver, scanning and not as often making platinum/palladium prints as well. > >So that development times at www.pyrocat-hd.com.... site look reasonable to me except for that of the film speed change, I set my meter at half the film speed for all of films out there: my vice ? > >Cheers > >Pablo > >On Mar 16, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > >One thing about pyrocat hd is that there's no one authoritative listing of times/temps/dilutions for this developer. When I found myself AGAIN spending a 1/2 hour googling for times for a film I'd never developed before, I made the suggestion at the http://www.pyrocat-hd.com site that their's would be the best place to list whatever times Sandy had as I'd find those more believable than ones found on the Massive Development Chart or some forum as we don't know who came up with those times, if they were rank amateurs, or just some prankster inputting any ol' thing. > >pyrocat-hd.com has responded with this starter page. > >http://www.pyrocat-hd.com/html/times.html > > > > >________________________________ > >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4874 - Release Date: 03/16/12 > > >________________________________ > >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4874 - Release Date: 03/16/12