[pure-silver] Re: Jobo Processor advice - Whole New Can of Nematodae
- From: "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:32:49 +0200
Quoting Nick Zentena <zentena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Monday 12 September 2005 11:20, Edward C. Zimmermann wrote:
>
> >
> > It should be easy to source from wherever you get your professional colour
> > chemistry from.
> >
> > > without jiggering anything up? If I use the stabiliser, do I give the
> > > print
> >
> > Of course. What should it jigger, resp. bugger, up? Its a good final
> rinse.
>
>
> Jobo claims [or used to] that stabilizer did bad things to film reels.
> No
The observation by Jobo (and others) was that though improper or insufficient
washing of reels loading became more difficult. Some of the surfactants (found
in wetting agents) can indeed accumulate (Triton-X, for example, is a phenol)
on the reels but can be removed by detergents in washing. Many of colour film
final rinses contain formalin--- or a product that degrades into formalin--
but some like Kodak's E-6 use formalin in the pre-conditioner.
With paper, however, we don't have any reel to walk-into and even traces should
not pose any problems.
(One should also note that many commercial developers contain substances such
as Triton-X).
> idea how bad it might be for just the drum.
--
--
Edward C. Zimmermann, Basis Systeme netzwerk, Munich
Office Leo (R&D):
Leopoldstrasse 53-55, D-80802 Munich,
Federal Republic of Germany
http://www.nonmonotonic.net
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
