[pure-silver] Re: Dr5 process

  • From: Brian Reynolds <reynolds@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 20:01:59 -0500

Shannon Stoney wrote:
> 
> I've been playing with my new stereo pinhole Holga camera some more.
> I figured out how the viewfinder works on top: it's not wide angle
> after all.  There isn't much info online about this camera. But I
> figured out that you are supposed to use slide film in it, because
> of the way the stereo photo viewer works.  I had some color slide
> film in medium format, so I shot that in it.

I shoot a lot of MF3D (Medium Format 3D (stereo)).  Mostly I use a
Sputnik, but I started with twinned Lubitel 166 Universals (not the
recent Lubitel 166+), and various MF cameras on a slide bar.

Do you have the Holga 120 3D Stereo Pinhole Camera?  It's probably OK
as Holgas go.  I've also shot MF3D pinhole with a Zero Image camera,
and with a 4x5 pinhole camera.  You want to make sure that there are
no light leaks.  You will probably also have to flock the inside of
the camera to make sure there is no internal flare.  The Sputnik also
has these problems (and others) until you tune it.

The Holga viewer and slide mounts are junk.  The mounts have the wrong
spacing to be easily viewable, and the viewer is very low quality.

I brought a few of my slides and a viewer (made by a friend in Canada
and no longer available) to the 2010 Photo Plus Expo.  The Holga
samples (lens and pinhole) at one of the booths weren't too bad in a
good viewer, but my own views (taken with a tuned Sputnik) looked
awful in the Holga viewer.

3D World in China is currently manufacturing 120 film stereo cameras
(the TL-120), plastic mounts, and viewers.  The cameras are OK, but
expensive.  I don't like the plastic mounts, but I'm a traditionalist,
and I want the cropping that is available with cardboard mounts (6x6,
6x4.5 portrait, 6x4.5 landscape, and panorama), which are no longer
widely available.  The viewers are good.  They are not as good as the
previously available hand made viewers, but they are readily
available, and much less expensive.

If you'd like more stereo information you can look up the photo-3d
(general stereo photography) and MF3D-group (specializing in Medium
Format stereo) mailing lists on yahoogroups, or some of my earlier
ramblings about MF3D on this list.

> Then i found a place online that processes all kinds of film by a
> new process to make b & w transparencies.  HEre it is:
> 
> http://www.dr5.com/
> 
> This guy claims to be able to process regular negative film with
> this Dr5 process to make transparencies!  Does this work?  It's kind
> of expensive, but interesting.

Some MF3D folks use Dr5 to produce B&W stereo transparencies.  They
can look nice, but are expensive.  Tech Pan in 120 was the best B&W
transparency film (much better than Scala), and some folks on MF3D
were reversal processing it at home, but Tech Pan hasn't been
available in a long time.

-- 
Brian Reynolds                  | "It's just like flying a spaceship.
reynolds@xxxxxxxxx              |  You push some buttons and see
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan
NAR# 54438                      |  
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: