[pskmail] Re: jPSKmail 1.5 beta 2

  • From: Pär Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:01:27 +0100

Hi John,

Sure, I can create more spreadsheets. There are better templates around
for doing things like this, I should look at those and do better:
http://1013.fi/project-management/using-google-docs-issue-tracking

73, Per



tis 2011-12-27 klockan 19:56 +1100 skrev John Douyere:
> Per,
> 
> This is a good format, can we have the same for the server, version 2
> of jPskmail and AndPskmail, or if you think it is better, a combined
> bug list with the application tested as a key or field?
> 
> 73, John
> 
> On Dec 27, 2011 9:00 AM, "Per Crusefalk" <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         Hi all,
>         
>         Been doing some bench testing of beta 2 of jPSKmail 1.5
>         tonight. Seems
>         good enough so I think it's pretty safe to test now. I have a
>         few things
>         on the to do list still. They are:
>         - It's now possible to send Cc's of emails. Works in the
>         client but I
>         need to patch the server before it works all the way. So, you
>         can cc
>         emails now but only the To-addressees will receive the email.
>         - Gunnar reported an issue downloading several emails and also
>         transmitting several emails. I have not been able to recreate
>         that issue
>         yet. That side should be just as version 1.4 beta 8 so the
>         problem
>         should already be around.
>         - Deleting ALL the contacts in the address book may not save
>         an empty
>         address book csv file.
>         - The manual needs an update.
>         
>         The installers are here for now:
>         
>         http://www.crusefalk.se/jpskmailinstall/
>         
>         There is a google spreadsheet where issues testers find are
>         noted, you
>         are more than welcome to add things you may find there. It is
>         available
>         here: http://goo.gl/3zo2d
>         
>         73 de Per, sm0rwo
>         
>         
>         



Other related posts: