Or we could add a footnote to section 105 of book 10: "The name of the officer is Captain Prarg, make a note of his name in the margin of your Action Chart - it could be of use later in your adventures." ______________________________________________________________> Od: "McSwain LeRoy" > Komu: > Datum: 02.12.2009 02:33
> Předmět: [projectaon] Re: Editor's Companion Submission > couldn't we amend to?: 'If you took part in the Battle of Cetza and met Captain Prarg there,' :-) > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:07:23 +0000 > From: outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [projectaon] Re: Editor's Companion Submission> > On 01/12/2009 20:20, Thomas Wolmer wrote:
> >>> If no one has any complaints about the wording, I'll get these into the test > >>> area tonight or tomorrow morning. Phew! > >> > >> If we footnoted them as "Only turn to this section if you personally > >> commanded a company of men who defended the bridge at the Battle of > >> Cetza", would that work? I'm working from vague memory here. > > > > Well, more like attacked the bridge (or came to the support of those > > who were attacking the bridge, to be specific). But this is > > unnecessarily deta iled as you either (sooner or later) follow Prince > > Graygor fighting at the hill, or you fight at the bridge. > > > > But do we really need a footnote, can't we just extend the text here > > with this extra qualifier? "If you took part in the Battle of Cetza > > and fought with the Lencian knights at the bridge", or somesuch?> > But would a normal person remember such a vague detail from five (or even seven) books previous? ;-) > > -- > Simon Osborne
> Project Aon> > ~~~~~~
> Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon> >
USBメモリ代わりにお使いください。無料で使える25GB。 SkyDriveを今すぐ体験