[project1dev] Re: Project1 - SVN Update 399
- From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:19:32 -0700
yeah interesting thought... hard to say what the best course of action is
but what you are saying is as good an idea as i can think of... :P
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wasn't bad. I had to switch up my way of thinking but once I was in the
> groove it was easy. I see some potential complexity issues. Let's say with
> the kitties I have now I want to have 2 states at once, one for wander one
> for look at player. Let's say I wanted to look at the player while
> wandering. What would be the best way to do that? I was thinking to just
> have multiple states that the kitty could be in. Maybe one would be
> MovementState and the other would be LookingState. Does that sound right?
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> How do you feel about the state machine way of doing things? Is it good
>> or bad or just different?
>>
>> Was converting very difficult?
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Apache User <
>> dhapache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> User:korgath
>>>
>>> Message: finished converting the kitty to a simple state machine as Alan
>>> recommended. removed kitties backing away when the player is close for now.
>>>
>>> <Files Changed>
>>> U Scripts/Enemies/kitty.lua
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
