A good teacher must have a higher level of understanding of the concepts being introduced at a lower level to ensure that no misleading ideas are introduced through over simplification. Best wishes! Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: <jaffar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 1:44 PM Subject: Re: a virtual math tv program sort of challenge Hi. Please be aware that we're not interested in explaining math theory. The children we are targetting are in the 7 to 10 age group, and the main purpose of our software is to introduce mathematical concepts, the difference between odd and even numbers being just one such concept. Cheers! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob J." <rjustice004@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 12:54 AM Subject: Re: a virtual math tv program sort of challenge > RE: Odd vs Even numbers > > Is the concept of "odd and even" limited to the set of whole numbers? I > can't recall ever hearing any discussion of that concept being applied to > other than whole numbers. My recollection of the test for "even" numbers > is > "Can the target number be divided evenly by two?" If the concept of "odd > and even" is limited to whole numbers then so be it. > > I raise the question because of the following: > > 24/2=12 where the least significant digit of the "target number" (4) and > the > least significant digit of the quotient (2) are in the same position and, > therefore, 24 is an even number. > > On the other hand: > 25/2=12.5 where the least significant digit of the "target number" (5) and > the least significant digit of the quotient (5) are NOT in the same > position > and, therefore, 25 is an odd number. > > So, are both of the folllowing numbers odd numbers? > > 1.6/2=0.8 > 1.7/2=0.85 > > Thanks, > > Bob > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <jaffar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 6:49 PM > Subject: a virtual math tv program sort of challenge > > > Hi all. My company has been commisioned to write a virtual math education > software for our local primary schools, the purpose of which is to try to > raise math standards among our kids. It will be an audio vidio software. > One of the functions of the program is to help the kids to distinguish > between even and odd numbers, so after a mathematical operation for > example, > should a result be obtained in an odd number, the answer will appear on > the > left side of the screen and vice versa. I have been put in charge of the > audio interface, and my job is to ensure that the audio when spoken > corresponds to the result flashed onscreen, so that odd numbers will be > announced on the the left speaker or on the left side of the headphones > etc. > I have also been given the task of deciding on the programming languages > to > be used, and I have thus far come up with 3 possibilities, C++ Python or > CSharp.net. Before i take up my conclusions with my boss however, There > are some questions in would need answering from the more experienced > programmers among you. > 1. For this software which is entirely windows based, I forsee a heavy > reliance on directX. Which programs among the 3 i have listed will allow > the easiest call to the directX API? > 2. In terms of performance, Which of the 3 will likely be the most > stable, > reliable and fastest? > 3. In writing audio/video programs such as these, which of the 3 > languages > will yield the best results in productivity in terms of programming time, > bearing in mind that we have 3 months to come up with a working model for > our education ministry to review? > 4. I am envisaging the software in question to be built as a desktop app, > but with a web UI. Could i then build the whole app interfacing 2 > programming languages, python for the web UI and c++ for the app itself, > for > example? How well would this model work? > Any comment or suggestion is very welcome. Thanks and Cheers! > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 3244 (20080705) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind