It took me many, many years to get pretty good playing the guitar.
It would take me many many years to understand what you just wrote.
The abstraction of a hex nanobot with a couple of bridges to nowhere climbing
through space time and then indicating a point on a graph, polar or rectangular
2 or 3 or more dimensional, got me confused when attempting to understand
measuring the potential, probable, entangled position and velocity of the
nanobot traversing say a worm whole without the ability to measure its position
and velocity without integrity destruction, although one experiment has been
published about a supposedly successful attempt at doing this.
Backing out the math, I am so weak as to not able to normalize the bridge, so I
am having trouble unentangling the 28 dimensions since I don’t see how the
nanobot can pull down 28 dimensions from the Higgs Space without disregarding
both string theory and, I believe, m-theory.
I wish I had enough math to give an example but, sigh, that has been my problem
so I have to live in the rather gross world of words.
I think I would have to use a vector system with the Eigan transforms to
describe it correctly and words sort of fall as flat as the formula you get
when you integrate (2 pi r) – I think you get (pi r squared) if I remember my
calc1 days and that is pretty flat indeed.
Anyway, nice talking to you – God bless and good hunting Uma!
Rick USA
