[procps] Re: shared memory in 'free'
- From: Adrian Brzezinski <adrb@xxxxx>
- To: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:52:46 +0200
On 2013-09-09 17:05, Jaromir Capik wrote:
>>> Guys, what do you think?
>>
>> Hi Jaromir,
>
> Hi Jim & Adrian.
>
>
>> Two new commits should do the trick.
>>
>> One to reverse your original and the second to re-apply with the desired
>> attribution.
>
> Ok, I've done that.
>
> The first commit reverts the changes and explains why
> the revert had to be done. The second commit re-introduces
> the changes + takes the example comment from the merge
> request + changes the forgotten "obsolete" comment
> to something more explanatory + makes Adrian the author
> of these changes.
>
> Adrian, please, look at the commits and let me know
> if you're ok with that.
Thank you, it's okay. I also appreciate your effort.
>
> Thank you.
Thank you again.
>
> Regards,
> Jaromir.
>
>
--
Adrian
adrb@xxxxx
http://arian-it.blogspot.com/
Other related posts:
