[procps] Re: first part of nls

  • From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:28:23 -0600

On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Craig Small wrote:

> It's merged merry Chirstmas.
> However the patches were missing the po file and associated structures
> for gettext so it won't configure.  I've run out of time to nick that
> stuff from your nls branch.


I think we have a disaster here.

The nls merge should have occurred first and smoothly applied your 106 patches.

Then my tarball would have sat on top with another 31 commits.

Please apply my patches to your nls branch so that when Craig gets around to 
resetting (fixing) his master we'll be ready for a simple, clean merge.


Other related posts: