[procps] Re: first part of nls
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:07:40 -0600
On Dec 22, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Craig Small wrote:
> It's done, using a nls branch off the main repository. That way if it is
> wrong the branch can be ditched.
>
> It looks identical to me, but there you go.
> I fixed slabtop -o (again).
I just discovered that nls branch and it looks good.
Wasn't that less painful than your original approach?
Jim
----------------------------------------------
On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Jim Warner wrote:
> Thus they could be applied to Sami's nls branch before the merge or applied
> to Craig's master after the merge.
"applied to Sami's nls branch BEFORE the merge"
or
"applied to Craig's master AFTER the merge"
So, of course, Craig applies the patches to his master before the merge.
Sure wish I'd been more clear...
Other related posts:
