[procps] Re: first part of nls
- From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:16:30 +1100
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:10:17PM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote:
> Not really. The nls branch is ready for merge, and as it holds 'lock'
> for pmap development it might be good idea to get it in. That would
> also be quite nice christmas present to me; when the branch is merged
> I know that I will never need to resolve conflicts in it again.
It's merged merry Chirstmas.
However the patches were missing the po file and associated structures
for gettext so it won't configure. I've run out of time to nick that
stuff from your nls branch.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Other related posts:
