[Precisionix-General] Re: Installer

  • From: Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx>
  • To: precisionix-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:04:01 -0700

good ideas! but maybe we should make a nice installer like YaST and have
it on a dvd full of packages?
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:18 -0700, daaawg wrote:
> With some caveats, I think a choice of desktop is a good idea.
> 
> Allowing that sort of choice for a total n00b would require some
> non-technical explanation to help her make an intelligent decision.
> Including the choices on the LiveCD (DVD?) would require space that
> might be better used for application binaries. I think some
> screenshots of each desktop and some apps on the website along with
> some text explaining the design philosophy behind each choice would go
> a long way in clearing up any confusion between desktop managers.
> 
> I think for the first go-round, the distro should be offered as
> separate disks for each desktop offered. Maybe even give a choice of
> isos with the Ubuntu-like installer for n00bs and the Debian installer
> for warriors. Not familiar with fluendo, but definitely need some sort
> of assistant for installing codecs that work with a chosen media
> player.
> 
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>         Yes, I think ubuntus installer is very easy --- but do we want
>         to give
>         users a choice of desktop durring install or not? As for
>         partitioning,
>         we can change that interface a little to make it easier and
>         less buggy
>         than the ubuntu one. fw-cutter is a poor driver, and would
>         rarely give
>         me more than 1Mb/s so I use ndiswrapper on that computer, and
>         the free
>         intel driver on my new laptop. We wont include DRM software or
>         such in
>         our distribution, maybe fluendo stuff and a codec assistant.
>         
>         On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 01:46 -0700, daaawg wrote:
>         > As far as my experience with the install process:
>         > I have many years supporting Windows systems professionally
>         in
>         > enterprise environments -- the install process for Ubuntu
>         blew me away
>         > -- very quick and painless. The only problem I had was
>         making a
>         > decision on how I should partition my drives. For a default
>         choice, I
>         > believe separate partitions for root and home are
>         appropriate, of
>         > course we would have to include a choice to leave any
>         windoze
>         > partition intact. For those choosing to set up custom
>         partitions, a
>         > simple statement explaining the sanity behind a separate
>         partition for
>         > the home directory would have saved me some time googling
>         for an
>         > answer to the question, "what makes a good linux partition
>         scheme?"
>         > The hardware detection was quite good, although my laptop
>         sound does
>         > not work :( even though it appears that the hardware was
>         detected
>         > properly. Wifi required the use of the fwcutter driver which
>         worked
>         > for about 10 minutes, at which point I googled the problem
>         from
>         > another computer, and installed the ndiswrapper for the
>         broadcom
>         > windows drivers. Of course, because of Ubuntu's philosophy,
>         I had to
>         > install non-free and/or proprietary codecs for dvd viewing.
>         Some of
>         > these problems are due to self-imposed constraints due to
>         ideology,
>         > some are due to legal issues such as DRM. Before any work is
>         done to
>         > build a distro, ground rules need to be set to cover these
>         issues. If
>         > it is going to be a distro that is crippled out of the box
>         due to
>         > legal/philosophical issues, then it should be made clear
>         right away
>         > why this is so, but it should be made as painless as
>         possible to get
>         > the software to make things work. I think Ubuntu did a good
>         job on the
>         > part of providing easy installation of the software pieces,
>         but I was
>         > pretty much in the dark as to why I had to jump through
>         these hoops.
>         > In summary, I think Ubuntu's install process is quite good
>         and
>         > deserves a close look.
>         >
>         > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Andrew Sorensen
>         <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>         >         I think its time we make some important decisions
>         about the
>         >         installer
>         >         process, since it will effect other aspects about
>         what we do.
>         >         we dont have any set way we have to do this yet, the
>         rest
>         >         needs to be
>         >         designed on a few questions...
>         >         here are some choices for package/install format:
>         >         1)Livecd + squashfs (like ubuntu) the user boots a
>         livecd, the
>         >         boot
>         >         process uses a squashfs on the cd as / tempfs, and
>         boots. When
>         >         the user
>         >         installs the distro, the squashfs is uncompressed to
>         the hard
>         >         disk, and
>         >         the installer program and unneeded things that were
>         >         uncompressed to disk
>         >         are removed, and the system config is setup..
>         >         advantages of this system are a fast install speed,
>         cons are
>         >         that user
>         >         has to install everything from the squashfs, and
>         remove what
>         >         they dont
>         >         need ;( (no choosing gnome vs kde here, unless you
>         got another
>         >         cd...)
>         >
>         >         2)debian based installer (like debian-installer in
>         debian)
>         >         this would simply install all the packages to the
>         users target
>         >         system,
>         >         it will take much longer than the first install
>         method,
>         >         however lets the
>         >         user choose just what they want to install.
>         >
>         >         3)some other setup (your ideas go here!)
>         >         if you know of a better way to do this, post here!
>         if you got
>         >         some ideas
>         >         about making a new installer, post here as well!
>         >         I think with our mailing list you just gotta do Re:
>         Installer
>         >         as subject
>         >         and precisionix-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx as mailto, and
>         it will
>         >         take it as
>         >         a reply.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > --
>         > The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning
>         'many',
>         > and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'.
>         > - Larry Hardiman
>         >
>         >
>         
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many',
> and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'.
> - Larry Hardiman
> 
> 


Other related posts: