good ideas! but maybe we should make a nice installer like YaST and have it on a dvd full of packages? On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:18 -0700, daaawg wrote: > With some caveats, I think a choice of desktop is a good idea. > > Allowing that sort of choice for a total n00b would require some > non-technical explanation to help her make an intelligent decision. > Including the choices on the LiveCD (DVD?) would require space that > might be better used for application binaries. I think some > screenshots of each desktop and some apps on the website along with > some text explaining the design philosophy behind each choice would go > a long way in clearing up any confusion between desktop managers. > > I think for the first go-round, the distro should be offered as > separate disks for each desktop offered. Maybe even give a choice of > isos with the Ubuntu-like installer for n00bs and the Debian installer > for warriors. Not familiar with fluendo, but definitely need some sort > of assistant for installing codecs that work with a chosen media > player. > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I think ubuntus installer is very easy --- but do we want > to give > users a choice of desktop durring install or not? As for > partitioning, > we can change that interface a little to make it easier and > less buggy > than the ubuntu one. fw-cutter is a poor driver, and would > rarely give > me more than 1Mb/s so I use ndiswrapper on that computer, and > the free > intel driver on my new laptop. We wont include DRM software or > such in > our distribution, maybe fluendo stuff and a codec assistant. > > On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 01:46 -0700, daaawg wrote: > > As far as my experience with the install process: > > I have many years supporting Windows systems professionally > in > > enterprise environments -- the install process for Ubuntu > blew me away > > -- very quick and painless. The only problem I had was > making a > > decision on how I should partition my drives. For a default > choice, I > > believe separate partitions for root and home are > appropriate, of > > course we would have to include a choice to leave any > windoze > > partition intact. For those choosing to set up custom > partitions, a > > simple statement explaining the sanity behind a separate > partition for > > the home directory would have saved me some time googling > for an > > answer to the question, "what makes a good linux partition > scheme?" > > The hardware detection was quite good, although my laptop > sound does > > not work :( even though it appears that the hardware was > detected > > properly. Wifi required the use of the fwcutter driver which > worked > > for about 10 minutes, at which point I googled the problem > from > > another computer, and installed the ndiswrapper for the > broadcom > > windows drivers. Of course, because of Ubuntu's philosophy, > I had to > > install non-free and/or proprietary codecs for dvd viewing. > Some of > > these problems are due to self-imposed constraints due to > ideology, > > some are due to legal issues such as DRM. Before any work is > done to > > build a distro, ground rules need to be set to cover these > issues. If > > it is going to be a distro that is crippled out of the box > due to > > legal/philosophical issues, then it should be made clear > right away > > why this is so, but it should be made as painless as > possible to get > > the software to make things work. I think Ubuntu did a good > job on the > > part of providing easy installation of the software pieces, > but I was > > pretty much in the dark as to why I had to jump through > these hoops. > > In summary, I think Ubuntu's install process is quite good > and > > deserves a close look. > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Andrew Sorensen > <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think its time we make some important decisions > about the > > installer > > process, since it will effect other aspects about > what we do. > > we dont have any set way we have to do this yet, the > rest > > needs to be > > designed on a few questions... > > here are some choices for package/install format: > > 1)Livecd + squashfs (like ubuntu) the user boots a > livecd, the > > boot > > process uses a squashfs on the cd as / tempfs, and > boots. When > > the user > > installs the distro, the squashfs is uncompressed to > the hard > > disk, and > > the installer program and unneeded things that were > > uncompressed to disk > > are removed, and the system config is setup.. > > advantages of this system are a fast install speed, > cons are > > that user > > has to install everything from the squashfs, and > remove what > > they dont > > need ;( (no choosing gnome vs kde here, unless you > got another > > cd...) > > > > 2)debian based installer (like debian-installer in > debian) > > this would simply install all the packages to the > users target > > system, > > it will take much longer than the first install > method, > > however lets the > > user choose just what they want to install. > > > > 3)some other setup (your ideas go here!) > > if you know of a better way to do this, post here! > if you got > > some ideas > > about making a new installer, post here as well! > > I think with our mailing list you just gotta do Re: > Installer > > as subject > > and precisionix-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx as mailto, and > it will > > take it as > > a reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning > 'many', > > and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'. > > - Larry Hardiman > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', > and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'. > - Larry Hardiman > >