[pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pedevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:54:37 +0200 CEST
"scott mc" <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's a patch that fixes all but one of the warnings, and in one
> case
> turned up a possible typo. There was a %F in a strftime() I changed
> it to %Y %c %d which would be 2008 Oct 9 for today's date, in
> HeaderHeader.cpp, or should it be %D which would be mm/dd/yy. This
> is
> used in the generated header when you select headerheader with a
> created field in it.
I don't understand this patch, and since François is to blame for this
particular component, I guess he should have a look.
Bye,
Axel.
Other related posts:
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?