[pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pedevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:47:13 +0200 CEST
"scott mc" <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch will most likely break building pe on BeOS and/or Zeta, so
> probably not something you'd want to apply. If I can be directed to
> a
> better type of solution this can serve as a guide to finding the
> cases
> that need fixing in a better way.
I've now fixed the issues correctly in r543 and before, if you want to
have a look :-)
Bye,
Axel.
Other related posts:
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Re: Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?
- » [pedevel] Building on Haiku, /boot/common instead of /boot/home/config?