-=PCTechTalk=- Single vs Dual Core speeds

  • From: <dsw32952@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:54:23 -0400

All else being as equal as possible to make a faie comparison - is a 3GHz 
single core processor faster or slower than a dual core operating at a typical 
2.0 GHz speed?  

It seems to me that without an OS and software written to support the dual core 
that there will be little if any benefit to a dual core processor unless each 
core operates at the same (or near same) speed as the single core being 
compared to.

Ditto with 64-bit processors.  

Can someone here put all this 32/64-bit single/dual/triple/quad-core 
gobbledy-gook into a perspective that makes sense to me (and everyone else 
here)?

Thanks,
Don

---------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything 
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.

To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk

To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/

To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to:
pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts:

  • » -=PCTechTalk=- Single vs Dual Core speeds