-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Single vs Dual Core speeds
- From: "Lilian" <lilian.oswaldocruz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:47:13 -0300
I second that... :o))
Lil
----- Original Message -----
From: <dsw32952@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 2008-06-18 13:54
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Single vs Dual Core speeds
All else being as equal as possible to make a faie comparison - is a 3GHz
single core processor faster or slower than a dual core operating at a
typical 2.0 GHz speed?
It seems to me that without an OS and software written to support the dual
core that there will be little if any benefit to a dual core processor
unless each core operates at the same (or near same) speed as the single
core being compared to.
Ditto with 64-bit processors.
Can someone here put all this 32/64-bit single/dual/triple/quad-core
gobbledy-gook into a perspective that makes sense to me (and everyone else
here)?
Thanks,
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.
To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to:
pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
