RE: shutdown abort warnings
- From: <Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:43:18 -0400
Appreciate the feedback, and will ignore the paper as it seems obviously close
to a decade old. Points taken away for either not removing the paper,
updating it, or not being more specific to include dates and versions at a
minimum. However it has to be Oracle 8 at the latest.
Joel Patterson
Database Administrator
joel.patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx
x72546
904 727-2546
________________________________
From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Patterson, Joel
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: shutdown abort warnings
This is a rather old paper:
The author is "currently working on a Y2K implementation project for the city
of Tulsa, OK."
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:46 AM, <Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was reading (and contributed my .02£), to the forum discussion awhile ago
concerning shutdown abort yet came across this advice and warnings of possible
corruption still being advertised.
Does this lend credit to the institution, or take points away? The leanings
where very much favorable to abort with much in depth analysis.
http://www.embarcadero.co.uk/resources/tech_papers/oracleorphan.pdf
If so, one wonders.... (not that I have any intention of utilizing there
services in the first place... it is simply academic).
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
Other related posts:
