RE: rac network question
- From: "Michael McMullen" <ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:01:21 -0500
That's what he's done, combined the both so public & private traffic is
combined. I'm assuming it's not supported and as such as this will be a very
high profile, critical database, he'll have to change.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Norris [mailto:dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: January 10, 2008 11:06 AM
To: ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: rac network question
Michael,
I see a huge problem and very likely a support issue as well. Basically what
he's saying is that the host will have a *single* logical network interface.
That *single* interface will need to serve as the private and public
interface and that's where Oracle Support may have some major problems.
If these blades only support 2 NICs (and you have no opportunities to expand
them), then I'd elect to leave the redundancy aside and take a NIC failure
as a whole node failure. Since the only other choice is to combine public
and private networks over a single logical interface, removing redundancy so
you have 2 separate logical/physical interfaces would be a favorable choice.
Dan
----- Original Message ----
Other related posts:
