RE: rac network question

  • From: "Michael McMullen" <ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'Matthew Zito'" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:46:06 -0500

I agree it will work, but isn't the private and public supposed to be
physically separate, not logically?


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Zito [mailto:mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: January 10, 2008 5:08 PM
To: ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: rac network question


Actually, just so's we're all clear, with the VLAN support that the
gentleman described originally, the interfaces will appear separate - eth0.1
and eth0.2 (note: different than eth0:1 and eth0:2).  The traffic will be
shared, but as long as the bonding works as it should, it just means that if
a card is lost, both the interconnect and the VIP will fail over to the
other link.  IMHO, while this is suboptimal, it should work fine.






Other related posts: