RE: Sun Servers
- From: Ronan Merrick <merrickronan1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Jack Applewhite <jack.applewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:19:53 +0100
Thanks for replying Jack.
Pretty much the same move I am looking at - Dell/Red Hat to Sun/OEL.
They will be standalone servers though not ODA's.
Ronan
On 8 Jul 2014 23:11, "Jack Applewhite" <jack.applewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> We've moved all our 20+ databases from RedHat Linux Dell servers to two
> new X4-2 ODAs - Oracle Linux on Sun servers. We're happy so far. The ODA
> environment is a lot more restrictive than just a standalone server.
> However, it is simpler.
> ----
> Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator
> Austin I.S.D. - MIS Department
> 512.414.9250 (wk)
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
> behalf of Ronan Merrick <merrickronan1@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 8, 2014 4:19 PM
> *To:* Andrew Kerber
> *Cc:* Matthew Zito; oracle-l
> *Subject:* Re: Sun Servers
>
> Thanks Andrew.
>
> I'll keep that in mind.
>
> Factory install of Oracle Linux is an option. I did all my OCP
> practicing and testing on Oracle Linux and I liked it.
>
> Ronan
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, then I have no opinion on that particular line. My irritations stem
>> from the Sun OS.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Zito <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Note that the X4-2 server *is* an Intel server, it's not one of the
>>> SPARC line of processors.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am really not fond of Sun servers. In my experience they are less
>>>> powerful then similarly priced intel servers, plus they have their own set
>>>> of foibles that are irritating.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew W. Kerber
>>
>> 'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
>>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including all attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential student and/or employee information. Unauthorized use of
> disclosure is prohibited under the federal Family Educational Rights &
> Privacy Act (20 U.S.C. §1232g, 34 CFR Part 99, 19 TAC 247.2, Gov’t Code
> 552.023, Educ. Code 21.355, 29 CFR 1630.14(b)(c)). If you are not the
> intended recipient, you may not use, disclose, copy or disseminate this
> information. Please call the sender immediately or reply by email and
> destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments.
>
Other related posts:
