RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: "Goulet, Richard" <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:34:49 -0500
John,
There is only one OS of any real consequence, Unix. Sure there are
a pile of different flavors from HP, IBM, Linux, Sun, etc....., but at
the core their all the same. Windows is one of those sideshows that
just doesn't seem to understand how irrelevant it is.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
PAREXEL International
978.313.3426
information transmitted in this communication is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please destroy any copies, contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer.
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- richa03