Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:37:55 +1100
John Thompson wrote,on my timestamp of 27/11/2008 5:23 AM:
Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in
utilization of existing technology.
I think you should also ask the question:
Should there be competition in any market or not?
Because the reasons for multiple OS makers are exactly
the same as the reasons for a diversified market.
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in overcast Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- richa03