Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?
- From: "David Ballester" <ballester.david@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:10:44 +0100
Hi:
I think that in some years ( may be 10, 15... ) will be only 1 OS supported
by Oracle, and will be mantained by Oracle. Call it Oracle Linux, Oracle
OS... Finally when we will need to put a database, we well talk with Oracle
and after say the aprox. number of user/transactions/data/purpose... after
two weeks we will receive a blackbox containing the cpus, disk, and software
'ready to use'
Ony imagination ;)
D.
Other related posts:
- » Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- John Thompson
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Mark W. Farnham
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Matthew Zito
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Nuno Souto
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple? - David Ballester
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Niall Litchfield
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- Goulet, Richard
- » Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?- richa03