Re: RMAN Duplication for Migration and Archived Logs
- From: "Alex Gorbachev" <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Sandra Becker" <sbecker6925@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:32:14 -0400
Sandra,
Any more or less important migration should be tested first.
Unavailability of the test environment is a bad argument - you get
what you pay for. So one of the best advices would be, obviously -
test it first.
I had no problem with restoring 32 to 64 and 64 to 32 bit (10.2). One
member of the list mentioned that he encountered problems with 64->32
bit restore/recovery so testing is a must.
Cheers,
Alex
On 8/2/07, Sandra Becker <sbecker6925@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Apparently when I moved from 32-bit to 64-bit, I was given bad advice. I
> was told that you couldn't apply 32-bit archived redo to a 64-bit database.
> Was this really bad advice? I need to do this migration again and would
> like a cleaner method than the last time I did this.
--
Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
