Re: There is no valid responsibility

  • From: <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:34:28 -0000

To say there is no correlation between responsibilities and workflow is not 
entirely true. Effective functioning of UMX roles and responsibilities do rely 
on synchronisation between FND and WF tables.

However the suggestion to remove the end_date on both responsibility and user 
is a valid option 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: DBA ORAPPS 
  To: ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Cc: ora-apps-dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:54 AM
  Subject: Re: There is no valid responsibility


  There is no relation between workflow and responsibilty missing. Check for 
the end date or put an end date.... Save it and renew with no end date. 


  Else try to add the same responsibilty to the user. 

  Sent from my blacbrry
  Sh:-)

  On 07-Jan-2010, at 2:39 PM, Ramakrishnan Seshadhri <ramakrishnan42@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


    Check if you workflow agent listeners are running. If not start it. 

    Note : You do not need to configure WF mailer. Starting all the Listeners 
will fix it.

     
    On 1/7/10, Harish Muramshetty <harish.muramshetty@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
      Hi Rajesh,

      Check this if it is helpful for your scenario.Go through the document 
433473.1 and apply patch # 6153778.

      NOTE: CREATE A SERVICE REQUEST, TAKE ORACLE ADVICE AND SUGGESTION THEN 
PROCEED IN TEST INSTANCE THEN PROD.


      Regards,
      Harish.


      On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Rajesh Loona <rloona@xxxxxx> wrote:

        Hi,



        I just changed the end date for the user and the end date for the
        responsibility to some date in April 2010, as both expired on 04 Jan
        2010. Now when the user logs in he gets the message as



        "Sorry, there is no valid responsibility".



        I tried by bouncing the Apache, but still the status is same. Then I
        tried to investigate and found that there is no record for this user in
        the table FND_USER_RESP_GROUPS, but in the other 2 tables
        FND_USER_RESP_GROUPS_ALL and FND_USER_RESP_GROUPS_DIRECT the record for
        this user is there. So can anyone please tell me if this is the reason
        for the error message and if yes what caused it and what is the
        solution?



        Thanks in advance,



        Rajesh Loona






Other related posts: