This is a sample of an FAF solution we developed for the Topcon 50EX. The capture camera is a Canon 5D Mark II. We can also do the Zeiss FF4. Generally, lack of utilization of the technology is commonplace. If there was a billing code specific to FAF, popularity would dramatically increase, one would think. I agree with Denise on how easy it is to create FAF's on the Spectralis. We came out with the fundus camera FAF version for those that cannot afford higher end imaging solutions. It's straightforward and simple, too. Marty, thanks for opening the discussion as FAF is an important diagnostic tool, by either SLO or fundus camera. Financial interest. Dale Brodsky President - Fundus Photo, LLC - Digital Fundus Cameras and Upgrades Owner - St. Louis Ophthalmic Equipment Company - in our 22nd year! 3015 Locust Street St. Louis, MO 63103 USA 314.533.6000 fax 314.534.6000 Mobile 314.406.3600 Visit our websites at http://www.stleye.com and http://www.fundusphoto.com email - dale.brodsky@xxxxxxxxx On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Angiographics <angiolith@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The retina doc at a practice I work with just found out that they own a > Canon CR-2 Plus in one of their remote offices. Can anyone comment on the > FAF (autofluorescence) on this camera? I could only find a few images > online. > > I realize this is designed as a non-myd, but we would probably take the > images dilated. > > This opens a slightly larger question: is fundus camera FAF as good a tool > as Spectralis FAF? And please, I am more interested in diagnostic ability > than aesthetics. > > Open the flamethrowers! > > Marty Rothenberg > Angiographics, Inc > >
Attachment:
FAF Study (2).jpg
Description: JPEG image
