Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> 1. What displays or what display interfaces are set up to accept >> a 21:9 anamorphic squeeze image from a BluRay disc or DTV medium, >> presumably this would be in a 1920 X 1080 container? > > Who cares. These containers are intentionally crippled. h.264 and > HDMI can easily handle 21:9 and much more. We've had this debate countless times. When you use analog interfaces, such as RGB or any of the TV analog display standards, it is critically important that you tell the STB or the PC what the display aspect ratio is. If you do not do so, all images to that display will become distorted. (For RGB, you typically give the aspect ratio in the form of pixels horizontal and vertical. For the others, it's almost universally either 4:3 or 16:9, and that's it. No other options provided.) If you buy an odd-ball shaped PC monitor, or PC monitor with oddball pixel configuration, the monitor *invariably* comes with a setup CD or DVD. In that setup disc comes whatever display drivers are needed, to get your video card to fill the screen correctly. BUT, such setup discs do not come with TV sets, that I've ever seen anyway. (Which is why I made sure, before buying the PC-STB I have, that the PC's video card could handle RGB to a 1366 X 768 TV set. Which oddly is also capable of 1360 X 768, which turned out to be the correct setting for the PC.) This is an orthogonal issue to what the transmitted images to that display are coded for. Now comes HDMI. One of the supposed advantages of a digital display interface is that you aren't supposed to have to mess with the monitor settings. But that *has* to mean, somehow or other, the STB or PC and the monitor have to talk to each other, so that the monitor can tell the PC or STB what its aspect ratio is. Right? Otherwise, that PC or STB will not know how to get an image to that display undistorted. Things will look tall and skinny or short and fat. So, can HDMI properly accommodate a screen whose aspect ratio is 4.38:1? Or for that matter 2.33:1? The answer is, **only if** the information to that screen is sent in **4:3 or 16:9 containers**. And then, the screen can do its own post-processing (aka cropping). Said another way, the display has to "pretend" to be either 4:3 or 16:9, and that's what the PC or the STB will assume it is. http://www.audioholics.com/education/display-formats-technology/hdmi-interface-a-beginners-guide ---------------------------------- Supported Color Space and Video Formats HDMI pixel encoding includes support for RGB 4:4:4 as well as digital TV's YCbCr 4:4:4 amd YCbCr 4:2:2 color spaces. The two 4:4:4 encoding formats are both 8-bit per component sampling for 24-bit per pixel delivery. The 4:2:2 encoding format uses up to 12-bits per component for greater color depth. HDMI can support all existing and planned PC or TV video formats. Several formats were specifically established in order to jump-start compatibility between products and media whose resolutions were different: SDTV: 720x480i (NTSC), 720x576i (PAL) EDTV: 640x480p (VGA), 720x480p (NTSC progressive), 720x576p (PAL progressive) HDTV: 1280x720p, 1920x1080i (1920x1080p is supported but was not initially defined when the spec was penned) All SD formats are available in 4:3 as well as 16:9 aspect ratios while HD formats are available in the 16:9 ratio only. ---------------------------------- So bottom line: the article was incorrect when it implied that 2.33:1 video was sent to the TV set as an anamorphic squeeze in a 1920 X 1080 container. There is no such beast. The info instead *has* to be sent as linear 1920 X 1080, letterboxed, pillarboxed, or postage stamped. And the TV set them crops it to fill the 2.33:1 screen area. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.