[opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable
- From: Ron Economos <w6rz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:35:23 -0800
It's the other way around. All DOCSIS 2.0 and 3.0 downstream data is
encapsulated in 188-byte MPEG-2 TS packets. It has to be, because the
ITU-T J.83B 256QAM format requires 188-byte TS packets.
See chapter 7 of the DOCSIS 2.0 Radio Frequency Interface Specification
for details.
http://www.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/specdocs/CM-SP-RFIv2.0-C02-090422.pdf
And Annex C in the DOCSIS 3.0 Physical Layer Specification.
http://www.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/specdocs/CM-SP-PHYv3.0-I12-150305.pdf
Ron
On 11/05/2015 04:04 AM, Craig Birkmaier wrote:
Regards
Craig
On Nov 4, 2015, at 9:15 PM, Ron Economos <w6rz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why would the PON need to be restructured? DOCSIS 3.0 downstream is MPEG-2 TS.
I don't think this is accurate. DOCSIS 3.0 uses IPv6. It is certainly possible
to map MPEG-2 TS into IP packets, but it is far from clear that this is
necessary or desirable.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable - Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- John Shutt
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier