[opendtv] Re: Pay-TV industry not united on TV Everywhere

  • From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:43:26 -0500

Mark Aitken wrote:

> OTA (local) broadcasters want a piece of the action because
> - surprise - they are the ones paying for the majority of it!
> Maybe it is a surprise, but in the case of FOX (as an example)
> typically only 2 hours a day of programming are provided by the
> network. That means that 22 hours of content is paid for by the
> local broadcaster. So, it seems only right and just that they
> participate in the economics of the the most viewed,valued by
> the consumer, content.

Okay, now let's apply that to the Internet distribution model, to see how the 
picture changes. Or even to an LTE RF utility. Use your Channel 45 as the 
example.

Just like the vast majority of MVPD TV channels, Internet distribution of TV 
content in a given market does not need to be restricted to any local sources. 
So, all of the Fox network content can now come from Fox. Any ThisTV content 
can now come from ThisTV. Any CoolTV content can come from CoolTV. These don't 
need to be extracted from a local transmitter tower, for Internet or even for 
MVPD distribution (except for legal restrictions).

The content owner, ThisTV, CoolTV, and Fox, would still have to deal with 
distribution pipes, but these are now ISPs and CDNs for Internet distribution, 
or those LTE utilities for OTA, not tall sticks. And the RF utilities would 
probably be just one or two per market.

So WBFF, on the Internet OR on an LTE-based RF utility, would no longer need to 
be associated with Fox and ThisTV programming. WBFF would be associated with 
Baltimore news and weather shows as now, and any other shows bought by WBFF 
that might not already be *on* the Internet. No sense paying to duplicate a lot 
of Internet content, right?

The risk, I think, of broadcasters going to a 4G LTE utility is that this would 
remove the last vestige of that distribution function broadcasters used to 
play. Now they are just another content owner. The distribution pipes become 
much more aggregated, like MVPDs and more so.

Bert


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: