Can't say that I've ever used one. When I was active in amateur radio satellite communications, I used crossed Yagi antennas. Either the elements were co-located and fed out 90 degrees out of phase, or the elements of one yagi were positioned 1/4 wave ahead/behind the elements of the other yagi (and both are fed in-phase). Here's a picture of a circular polarized yagi using the 1/4 wave offset technique. http://www.m2inc.com/products/vhf/2m/2mcp14.html Ron Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Ron Economos wrote:Google for "Lindenblad antenna".What a messy-looking antenna. Seems like a way to receive a circularly polarized signal, omnidirectional on the horizontal plane, using the mechanical alignment of four folded dipoles. The dipoles are each tilted 30 degrees from the horizontal, to follow the rotating waveform, along a nominally N/S and E/W set of orthogonal axes. The E field is rotating to the right or to the left as it propagates, and it flips 180 degrees for every 1/2 lambda of forward motion. Assume the two dipoles along either axis were located 1/2 lambda apart, and the two dipoles were wired on opposite phase but each oriented horizontally. They would each receive the same rotating E field as it travels through the antenna. Now untwist these two dipoles to be only 120 degrees apart, rather than 180 degrees apart, and the separation between them has to be reduced to (120/180) * 1/2 = 0.333 lambda apart. Does this sound reasonable? The key step is to think of each dipole pair as being twisted 120 degrees apart, rather than 60 degrees apart. I found this one site that shows the design in enough detail to find out if this explanation works: http://www.qsl.net/dl2lux/lindenblad/lindenblad.html It looks lie the "upper" side of the dipoles are all four connected together and sent to the center conductor of the coax downlead, and the "lower" sides go to the shield. So this means that in fact, along either axis, the two folded dipoles are connected out of phase with each other (Figure 5). And it shows that the folded dipoles are 0.3 lambda apart (Figure 1). So perhaps that explanation works. Figure 3 shows that this makes for a better OTA antenna than satellite antenna, unless the satellites are close to the horizon. I would think that you could achieve the same results by connecting one vertical dipole and two horizontal dipoles together, with a 90 degree delay line between the vertical and two horizontals. And get something less weird-looking. Thene again, you'd have to work out the impedance. The nice thing about four half-lambda folded dipoles paralleled together is that they work out to 300/4 = 75 ohms. How convenient for RG-6 or RG-59. Bert
---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.