I'll believe it when all I see is snow. Mark Aitken wrote: >So..do we now rewind the clock and start the stop watch again? >****************************************************** > > > >*Lawmakers Establish 2009 Deadline for Analog TV Phaseout* > >By Arshad Mohammed >Washington Post Staff Writer >Tuesday, December 20, 2005; D05 > >They've finally set a date -- Feb. 17, 2009. > >That's the last day the over-the-air analog signals that have brought >television programs into Americans' homes for decades will be broadcast, >leaving only digital signals, under an agreement reached by House and >Senate negotiators over the weekend. > >That means that millions of people will either have to buy new digital >TV sets or get their hands on a set-top converter box that allows the >digital channels to be viewed over an old analog television. In >addition, the negotiators agreed to spend up to $1.5 billion in federal >funds to subsidize the set-top boxes for consumers. > >Under the legislation, which was passed by the House yesterday and is >expected to be approved by the Senate this week, consumers will be able >to get up to two $40 coupons per household to help defray the cost of >the set-top boxes. > >The bill chiefly affects people who watch TV on sets that pick up analog >signals through their antennas. Cable companies are expected to win >permission from Congress to convert digital signals so they can be >viewed over an analog set. Satellite TV customers already receive >digital signals. > >The legislation will allow the government to take back the radio >spectrum used for analog TV broadcasts. The government then plans to >auction some of the spectrum to bring in an estimated $10 billion over >five years -- $7.4 billion of which would go toward reducing the budget >deficit. > >It also sets aside spectrum to help police, firefighters and other first >responders to communicate during emergencies. > >The legislation has been debated by lawmakers for months, with the most >contentious issues being the cutoff date -- which could put politicians >in the uncomfortable position of turning off voters' TV sets -- and the >amount of the set-top box subsidy. > >Some legislators argued that federal funds should not subsidize private >television viewing. But majorities in both houses of Congress concluded >that some money should be set aside to help. > >© 2005 The Washington Post Company > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901526_pf.html > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.