Huh? You were once "so hot" for fee-based mobile video. I recall trying to convince you and a few others that aside from live sports, the market was non-existent. You pointed up mobile video in cars. I pointed out that's a back seat audience, and there are few cars in use with occupied back seats. I'm still very skeptical of mobile video, and even more so of fee-based mobile video. I'll let you know when I hear from the first prospect in the U.S. who inquires about "conditional access" in PSI/PSIP generation, since that's a pre-requisite for fee-based services. There is virtually zero U.S. broadcaster interest in this technology at this point, by the way. I will say, as I have in the past, that broadcasters are in the best position to make mobile TV work. The issue is whether one wants to give up half their transport stream for it. I had a good laugh about the A-VSB system providing 6 mobile channels. (and, with the other half of the transport stream, or is it the other 1/4, we'll offer ....") Very funny speculation about the rights needing to be renegotiated, folks. That comes down to contract language, and I 'spec that the buyers (networks) had a better understanding of the realities when the language was negotiated than did the rights holders. I suspect that they didn't constrain their rights to just one form of digital modulation. Seems to me that all the systems being tested travel over 8-VSB, instead of supplanting it. John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Craig Birkmaier Enviado el: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:37 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Hurdles still loom as TV stations start mobile field trials At 3:33 PM -0500 1/14/08, John Shutt wrote: >----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Birkmaier" <craig@xxxxxxxxx> > >>So broadcasters do not have the right to send content to TV >>receivers that use antennas and run off of a battery? > >If broadcasters charge a subscription fee for the content, then >Hollywood will want a cut. If broadcasters do it a no charge, then >Hollywood will get a cut of nothing. > >Frankly it doesn't sound too unfair to me. Even the FCC wants a cut >if a broadcaster charges for content. > >John I agree with this John. In fact I sent a message a few days ago that said the same thing. So I guess that we need to read between the lines of the story and say that it looks like broadcasters want to offer a fee based mobile service. If that is the case they will fail miserably. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.