At 5:17 PM -0500 2/4/05, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >The only way Craig's idea that eliminating >must-carry would give umbillical distribution >nets more power is *if*, in addition to >eliminating must-carry, you simultaneously >invent a new anti-open-market law to force >separation of content and carriage. Huh? It is anti-open market to let a handful of companies control both the content and the distribution pipes. The separation of content and carriage IS pro market. You just admitted that the conglomerates have so much power that they could now live without must carry. You neglected to mention that it was Must Carry & Retransmission Consent that gave them this power... NOT the marketplace. >Since OTA nets can and do coexist and compete, >there's no call for creating such anti >competitive laws, IMO. Better to have six >conglomerates as opposed to one local >monopolistic gatekeeper. Yeah! Let's stick with the existing anti-competitive laws until the whole thing collapses! I have heard similar arguments recently related to the Social Security debate. The best way to be rid of this failed experiment in socialism is to do nothing, just wait for it to collapse. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.