Some might argue Craig is onto something, except he seems to have forgotten about the notion of a 'spectrum utility' (with a new standard, amongst other things, 20 channels of HDTV might be possible...I would not simply take the math posed...). I can assure you that (like it or NOT!), maximizing Nielsen 'eyeballs' is core. "If you cannot measure, they do not exist". Retrans, yes, important. But the rest is not lost... Mark -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 6:30 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: Arguments on CATV from the 1960s Craig Birkmaier wrote: > What if the extra eyeballs benefit the broadcaster more than the CATV > system? Or more to the point, what would it cost the broadcaster to > operate a low power repeater to serve the same homes? Then multiply > that by the number of stations delivered by the CATV system. Exactly. That's why I can only see one reason why broadcasters would be so upset with Aereo: broadcasters MIGHT be thinking, "We want to do this Internet streaming on our own, but the networks won't let us. So why should Aereo get away with this?" Nothing else makes a lot of sense. Aren't OTA broadcasters SUPPOSED to want to maximize their Nielsen ratings? Or have they forgotten that part, now thinking only in terms of retrans fees? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.