My greatist peeve about eBird is the "rare" reports. I am willing to waste the time filling out write-ins if the bird is actually a vagrant. Mostly they are not. The self appointed guardians of the knowledge need to back off on that. Example, Sibley shows the normal range of Mockingbirds from south central through south east Oregon. However, eBird requires they be writen up as "rare" in all three of the relevant counties. Hummm? Doesn't the scientific method require acceptance of all data to give accurate results? P.S. Recently figured out the the preferences page allows ebird contributers to opt out of the "rare" alerts. -- *Happy birdingCLAYClosed yahoo account and encourage you to not use yahoo. Please note my new email address*