I have to agree with Matt Hunter. I'm not seeing this bird as particularly light-colored or short-billed. As he notes, the shorter billed bird in his photo has started to replace scapulars, which indicates that it has commenced its preformative molt. This weekend I photographed both juv. Western Sandpipers and juv. Short-billed Dowitchers that had already replaced a few scapulars. Dave Irons www.birdfellow.com Sent from my iPhone On Aug 26, 2013, at 10:38 PM, "Matthew G Hunter" <matthewghunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rhett, you said: > "...for any "lurkers" and/or beginners out there wanting the full > conversation and > consensus on this bird, it's a lightly-colored, fairly short-billed Western > juvenile." > > Perhaps I'm missing something. I looked at these photos: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/boundtobird/9604076788/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/boundtobird/9604101582/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/boundtobird/9600860303/ > > These photos, to me, look like a normally colored juv Western Sandpiper, not > lightly-colored, and with a noticeably long bill. I would guess it was a > female; certainly in the range for one. > > Compare the "lightness" and short bill length of this juv Western Sandpiper > from the Umpqua Estuary a few days ago: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthewghunter/9590772493/. Without doubt, they > (w sand's bills) get even shorter than this. This juv has a few basic gray > feathers mixed in; I see one scapular and a few mantle feathers. > > This makes me curious, do you have photos of the "7 or 8 westerns around > it"???? > > Regards, > > Matt Hunter > Melrose, OR >