[ntnm] Re: no guardian

  • From: "Derek Hornby" <derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ntnm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:50:48 +0100

I think it's also worth noting that when we had
the talking news papers system there were far less problems
compared now.

It has never been made known as to why the old system could not stay,
why did things have to change?

Derek

-----Original Message-----
From: ntnm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ntnm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan H
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 8:21 PM
To: ntnm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ntnm] Re: no guardian

I think John might have meant sporadic rather than spasmodic!

Anyway, I've said this before and I'll say it again - RNIB need to
send a blank test email from the account their papers come from, to
check-auth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.


If the results that come back are not either "pass" or at least
"neutral", then that's where the problem will be. 99% of the time,
that's why email isn't delivered.


Incidentally, anyone can try this, and it's an interesting test - if
your emails don't get through, then ANY of the tests failing will be
the reason!


Other related posts: