[nanomsg] nanomsg and pub/sub robustness

  • From: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:29:38 +0100

Hello,

a colleague of mine tried to use nanomsg, but ran into problems with pub-sub. According to him, if the publisher side crashes, all subscriptions are gone, and since subscribes don't notice when the publisher restarted itself, they can't reinitialize anything on their end, leading to a system which can't communicate.

Is this correct? If so, is this a bug, or a design issue?

Other related posts: