[nanomsg] Re: nanomsg 0.1-alpha released
- From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:37:18 +0200
I think it might be a good thing to have this list of changes between
zeromq and nanomsg on the website/documentation, since you took the time to
write it better make it visible.
it may already be somewhere on the website but I couldn't find it.
On 29 August 2013 16:43, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for kind words!
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 29/08/13 16:26, Schmurfy wrote:
>
>> That's great news !
>> Glad to see you that you managed to fix a lot of zeromq problems in the
>> process and a lot of thoughts was put into nanomsg, thanks for this
>> great project :)
>> I also like reading your blog posts a lot, understanding why you did
>> some things this way or that way is always an interesting read.
>>
>>
>> On 20 August 2013 15:56, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gonzalo,
>>
>>
>> - IPC transport on Windows (via NamedPipes).
>>
>>
>> I thought this was already part of nanomsg; my bad. Is anybody
>> working
>> on this right now?
>>
>>
>> Not that I am aware of. If you want to give it a try, feel free to
>> do so. However, it's not going to be trivial -- NamedPipes are not
>> exposed via BSD sockets, so the related code already present in
>> nanomsg cannot be used directly. Rather, it has to be copy-pasted
>> and tweaked to work with NamedPipes.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
