[nanomsg] Re: Development Focus of nanomsg
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:17:00 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17/03/14 11:55, Christoph Zach wrote:
> We are planing on using nanomsg for implementing failure-safe/aware
> software systems. E.g. one of our requirements is to ensure that
> not matter what happens the system will be always in a state, which
> allows to clean up as nicely as possible every used external
> component (hardware). This is important to avoid unecessary damage
> to equipment/people.
Agreed with Dirkjan.
That being said, yes, being safe in the face of partial failure is one
of the goals of the project. For example, if one subscriber in pub/sub
topology dies, it won't affect other subscribers in any way.
Similarly, if one worker dies in req/rep topology, the requests are
re-routed to a different worker. Etc.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTJ/LnAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YEnUH/jOLWL9YnzC2TGbru4J2tTRP
H4lJJQtHb/LInvzc662zZ9ja1GenZpPWQAg8WWwukaWWPLXUahmCXUy+jD+zArzd
ldE53p2W4nbPzKm92XQeGnNNFdkFM4dWDMIw8lCMg0lYlOBnBIwTZ7F5DP+zn0o2
p0rsS4ARUg2r0jq/opjdqNmwoDmVOusQ8fhk0Sv28ovhHrswOuOEnLR1X4zO55yf
LY3mb5U71iYBoDPMTUsqyTV7t83ZgaqL8cKe6exGowHAeCn0vblMOYjlS/A81mot
FLPzGCiHrZhOfGW21ewnhZ80ydlg0B6WtbaiOqv/2WPTxVgQwUJB90gvSjLEVEs=
=9GrP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
